Top reasons why resume length effects quality

Top reasons why resume length effects qualityQuality Resume

The key document in any job search, a resume has risen as the need of the hour in today’s job market. Whether you are a fresher, entry-level, mid-management, or senior leadership professional, a resume will not only become a medium to showcase your capabilities, but will also serve as a key tool in convincing a recruiter to either hire or fix up an interview with you.

A professionally crafted resume not only serves as a perfect portrayal of a candidate’s abilities, but also demonstrates their inclination on obtaining a particular role. A well-drafted resume acts as a recruiter magnet, making a candidate stand out from a crowd of similar or less deserving candidates who don’t fit with the requirements of a job.

With so much emphasis being placed on creating the perfect draft, the natural question that arises is that what do employers look for in a resume – do they seek lengthy, descriptive CVs, or do they prefer a quick-to-read resume? For this, let us quickly understand what are the two documents and the discernible differences.

Definition & Differences

A resume is a crisp and concise summary document of a candidate’s employment and academic background, as well their skills and abilities acquired over the course of the employment or academics. Modern resumes do not go beyond two to three pages at their maximum, no matter how long the employment experience is. These can be used by any professional, right from fresher to senior management professionals to apply for a job opening.

On the other hand, a CV is a comprehensive document that lists in excruciating detail, a candidate’s work history, skills, qualifications, and other professional pursuits, and is a document of unspecified length, and ideally should be more than four to five pages. In fact, the longer the CV, the better it is. This document can only be used by a professional with some experience, right from entry level to senior management professionals, and is mostly developed on demand by a job.

The length versus quality debate has been in the resume writing industry since quite long, and professional writers have varying opinions on it. While some prefer the detailed CVs, most prefer a quickly whipped and concise resume for catering to job needs. Both have their merits and demerits, which would be addressed in the subsequent part of the article.

The Quality Aspect

A resume is the initial impression that a recruiter has on a candidate, and might be the last one if it does not follow basic guidelines in drafting. A poorly conceived resume will hit the trash pile faster than you saying “job”. The prevailing preference for resume length is two to three pages; any longer and it deters the interviewer from calling you. A crisp resume offers the benefit of consideration from an employer for an interview call.

Individual companies have hiring processes that work differently. Researching the exact job applied for and tailoring the resume accordingly goes a long way – skill mapping with job requirement is literally one of the best ways to secure an interview call. Moreover, a qualitative resume will go a long way in presenting yourself as a valuable catch to the employers.

Another aspect to quality resumes is the way you present the information. A company with a formal corporate culture would prefer resumes that are simple and easy to read, while a creative job would offer more liberty to present the information. A quality resume would also comprise of highly unusual or unique skills that would be valuable to a company, and showcase your knowledge and talents.

The Length Debacle

Lengthy resumes are what professional resume writing terms as a Curriculum Vitae, since it provides an in-depth overview of experience, education, and skills over the course of several pages. Since these are in greater detail, they comprise of longer sections, and list out even the minor roles, responsibilities, and credentials at one place.

While cutting short on information in a quality resume allows a recruiter to read the key aspects of your career, a CV offers much more space in terms of expanding information related to responsibilities, achievements, academic and professional credentials, and more such things. As the career of an individual progresses, their CV will expand on the go.

A detailed CV finds its use in academic, scientific or medical fields that are looking for a more complete and comprehensive picture of a candidate. Mostly, European and Australian jobs ask for a CV, since they prefer detailing on a candidate’s professional background. For this, the additional space offered by a CV is a wonderful place to focus on a person’s skills, qualifications, and experience.

Conclusion

While both have their merits and demerits, what matters ultimately is their usage – use the documents that have been specified for a job opening, be it a resume or a CV. Also, a key point to keep in mind here is that while a CV might allow more room, it is advisable to not ramble, and keep it to the point so that recruiters can seek the required information easily.

Additionally, supplementing both documents with the latest and newest information is they right way, since it will enable you to apply for jobs instantly, without waiting to write down your document at the last moment. It also portrays you as an agile job seeker, who is ready to accept new responsibilities and challenges on the go

Author

Amrita Kolay

Sundar Pichai’s approach That Will Change Your Perspective Towards Work

Sundar Pichai’s approach That Will Change Your Perspective Towards Work

Sundar Pichai approach

Less than four years ago, very few people outside of the tech world knew about Pichai Sundararajan, or Sundar Pichai, as he is more well-known. At one time, he was just a middle-management Googler, working as a Director of Product Development. It all changed in 2015, when Google announced that Pichai would be the leading man for all products, and the company itself. Things changed overnight, and Pichai was brought into limelight.

Today, the IIT-K – Stanford – Wharton graduate is leading the tech giant’s flag from artificial intelligence, to virtual reality; from home automation to driverless cars. The man has been much appreciated for his dedication to work, innovation, and driving teams to achieve their best. It is therefore, no wonder that he is an inspiration to millions, and individuals look up to him as a true people’s leader.

A former Google employee, who started working a year prior to Pichai, who started in 2004, notes that “Even though Pichai was smart and capable from the get-go, NO ONE would have guessed he would end up as the company’s second-in-command. He did not have an obvious flair or overwhelming charm.” So, what is it about Pichai that people find hard to resist from working for/with him?

Most of the people who are working for or have worked with Pichai vouch for his empathetic nature towards his employees. They say he actually cares about the people he works with, and is very supportive. They claim that Pichai works towards building a team rather than simply hiring people. He emphasizes on hiring or promoting the best, meritorious, and deserving people, as opposed to people who are opportunistic and political in nature, says another Googler. People want to transfer to his organization, since he has developed a reputation of being so enjoyable to work with, which stems from his ability to create and build strong teams.

There are many tales to Pichai’s supportive and motivating persona; one former Googler mentioned on Quora that while Sundar was heading the Chrome project, he visited the Mountain View office of Google, quickly introduced himself to Pichai, not thinking it would go beyond that. Not only did Sundar show an interest in his work, but went on to appreciate him for the contributions he was making towards making Google better than its competitors, even though the work was a small piece in the bigger puzzle. Another former employee notes that Pichai was one of the best people he’d worked with, adding that when he decided to leave Google for a start-up, Pichai was incredibly supportive and offered to help in any way he could.

Another aspect to Pichai’s leadership is how seamlessly he interprets Larry Page’s vision, presents to different teams, and collaborates with them to realize the dream. Once, there was a planning meeting at Google with a group of VPs and Directors from across products to discuss several secret projects, and they were all bickering. Page walked in, talked about abstract concepts and big ideas not related to the pre-set engineering roadmap, and introduced aspects the teams hadn’t expected even in their wildest thoughts. The entire room plunged into shocked silence, and Page walked out without getting a single question. Seconds later, Pichai walked in and simplified everything for the team. Post meeting conclusion, he talked to all teams individually, and helped them understand the future roadmap on which they were to proceed together.

Sundar is also noted for his amicable nature, humility, and sheer brilliance. Not only is he able to connect effortlessly with a wider age group, he is also able to integrate and bring together people from different disciplines, and make them work towards the collective good of the whole company, including the business side. He prefers to sit down one-on-one with people, explain the strategy, and get them on board. While Google has politics like any other large company, Sundar has waded through those to make his team successful while rendering the least possible damage on any other team. He is widely regarded as an efficient problem solver and knows how to get the best of everything, without disregarding anyone’s idea completely.

A story on Sundar Pichai’s collaborative nature goes on tell that he is the kind of leader/manager who would sit and quietly listen to what everyone had to say, and then deliver an idea that could work for everyone. Such are his people orientation abilities, that he has been lauded for his opinionated nature, while providing others the opportunity to present their ideas before delivering his own opinion.

Additionally, Pichai has a great regard for quality work, focus, and results, and deals with it through a “substance over overt style” attitude. Combine that with his high people orientation and task orientation approach, Pichai has clearly succeeded in becoming a great CEO of a great company. As a Quora user pointed out, “competence can be gained in an IIT or IIM or Wharton, or literally anywhere with the right attitude; but when that meets high consciousness/awareness of people and happenings around – magic happens.” I believe, Sundar Pichai is a living example of the magic reaped through perseverance and empathy.

Post Author:

Amrita Kolay